3 Jul
2009
3 Jul
'09
3:35 p.m.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 15:23, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
and has no influence in mkiv. (The workaround in mkii is to use \theta instead of θ, in mkiv it makes no difference.)
in mkiv (unicode) we need complete bold fonts .. (or make additional vectors); bold alphabets are part of math in unicode and should work ok but symbols is a 'whole font' issue
I agree ... there are lots of other symbols. I noticed the "tex-bi" in math-vfu (I'm still looking into beta version). There's no mapping for it, but I guess that it's probably exactly the same as "math-bi". Do you plan to misuse "tex-bi" or to to define mathematics.make_font ( "lmroman10-boldmath" ... ) for bold math then? Mojca