Hi Dalyoung, I can confirm that in displayed math, the digit 1 in the command \frac{1}{2} results in 494 > 1 which is unexpected… However the command {1 \over 2} gives the correct result. Actually there seems to be a spurious 494 > in the source tree of the latest release, since any command such as \frac{a}{2} results in 494 > a Best regards: OK
On 21 Dec 2015, at 14:01, Jeong Dal
wrote: Dear Hans,
After updating the minimal, I got a strange output of math display mode. Would you please check it?
Here is an example.
Best regards, Thank you.
Dalyoung
%%%%%%%%%%%% \starttext
Here is a strange output of math formula. It is displayed correctly in text line, but is displayed strangely in math display mode. \blank Here is a correct output in text line. $\int_0^t B(s)\ dB(s) = \frac{1}{2} B^2(t) - \frac{1}{2} t.$ \blank But in the output of display mode, the location of the sub- super-script of the integral sign is not normal and the output of \type{ \frac{1}{2} B^2(t)} is wrong.
\startformula \int_0^t B(s)\ dB(s) = \frac{1}{2} B^2(t) - \frac{1}{2} t. \stopformula \stoptext %%%%%%%%%%%%%% ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________