On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 08:47, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Saturday 03 April 2010 07:37:36 Gour wrote:
However, when I ask somewhere about the support for ConTeXt I'm getting answers like: "This is the project which has only 5 or 6 users. Who actually uses it? Use LaTeX!" :-(
You can use MS-Word - it has a *huge* user base!
I really love that answer :) :) :) And it's definitely true. Much more true than the ConTeXt-to-LaTeX ratio :) ConTeXt has a bus-factor of 1. Well, if you ask me, the whole LaTeX core has bus-factor 0 (apart from some well-maintaned packages; and even those packages usually have bus-factor just a tiny fraction above 1; including TikZ, tex4ht, ...). If you want full support and more guarantee with a higher bus-factor, you should better choose Adobe or Microsoft products and I really mean it. For me it's just fun to browse the sources from time to time ... It is definitely true that a manual is needed (everyone agrees with that), but you need to keep in mind that Hans makes a living with what he does and we can be extremely happy that he releases ConTeXt publically at all (he could just as well keep it in private for himself and his company). Writing a good manual could easily take one-man-year or more, so if some company is willing to pay him for that, he (or some other almost-developer) would probably do it. What nobody here realizes that main developers of jQuery or any other tools probably don't answer dozens of mails daily to beginners' questions on the mailing lists. As already said: anyone is free to start writing a manual by himself. People to help will join later ... Just start. Mojca