On 1/18/2016 10:16 AM, Jan U. Hasecke wrote:
Am 17.01.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 1/16/2016 3:58 PM, Jan U. Hasecke wrote:
Am 16.01.2016 um 13:31 schrieb Schmitz Thomas A.:
Please provide a minimal example of your problem. It’s impossible to help when we have no clue what you’re doing.
Sorry, of course.
After setting up a mwe I found that it is a font related issue.
When I don't specify a font, it works. --> example.tex
When I choose EB Garamond, it does not work. -- example-Garamond.tex
I confirmed this behaviour in my real setup.
don't assume that ligatures are always real ligatures ... in that font it's just kerning .. this kind of works okay:
\replaceword[sellig][auflösen][auf{-}{}{\zwnj}lösen]
I am confused as the specimen of EB Garamond mentions (real) ligatures. They are listed as glyphs.
https://github.com/georgd/EB-Garamond/blob/master/specimen/Specimen.pdf
maybe the archaic st ligature is a precomposed but f f l i aren't done that way but by either kerning or replacement of individual glyphs + kerning (there are many methods for this) ... also, 'liga' might mean ligature but in practice is used for all kind of things ... in opentype 'ligature substitution' is just a many-to-one replacement but that doesn't mean that 'liga' uses that ... welcome to the inconsistent open type mess Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------