![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6114858d84b0f40cf715f12237ab67a1.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Adam Duck wrote:
Mojca Miklavec writes:
Adam Duck wrote:
So, I've stumbled across a problem: if you have only two authors in a BibTeX entry, cont-au.bst sets "AuthorA and AuthorB" which is -- IMHO -- unaccaptable for a german document. I had to manually edit cont-au.bst and change a line in /.../ from "and" to "und". Is there a cleaner way? If I typeset an english document now, I'll get an "und"...
Take a look at bibl-apa.tex and bibl-aps.tex.
Depending on what kind of citing you use, you may say something like \setupcite[authoryear][lastpubsep={ und }] and for all the other citing modes the same.
< 38 lines deleted by Adam Duck >
Yes, this I've done and it works. But that's not the problem I was referring to. `lastpubsep' is used if you have more than one paper to refer to in the same \cite-command (\cite[paperA,paperB]) but it is _not_ used if a paper has only two authors (\cite[paperC]).
Sorry, my mistake. Does \setuppublicationlist[lastnamesep={ und }] solve the problem? (But English words are spread over the whole bibl-*.tex file, so there are surely much more strings to modify.)
I've seen some language specific functions in geralpha.bst. Perhaps I should dive into it a bit... But I don't really understand bst-syntax :).
I've heard many people complaining about unreadability of bst. The nice part of ConTeXt bib module is that you generally don't have to understand/modify it except for very special purposes.If I understood it properly, you only have to modify .bst in case you have weird entries & fields in .bib format and you don't want to ignore them. If you write bibliography directly in ConTeXt, it's more user friendly. Mojca