![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/49e63acb01f2ca80efce7eed08310ce8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 1/18/2017 6:23 PM, Nicola wrote:
On 18/01/2017 17:53, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Nicola,
In fact, if you are in a hurry and don’t use subtle things introduced since May 2016, you can use the stable version of ConTeXt from TeXLive 2016 (the bug noticed by Mikael, and you, is absent from that version of ConTeXt).
Thanks, that's what I am doing now. Strangely enough, it fixes the layout for all the slides, *except* the one I have posted before. But that one I can easily fix.
the current (yesterdays) beta should be ok .. (the midpar flushing of a formula) a while ago i reimplemented spacing around display math and as a side effect there might be slightly different spacing (in which case probably the old situation was wrong it relates to the fact that tex (traditionally) has some assumptions and does some spacing that interferes with the way we want to control spacing (e.g. it always forces baselineskips while we don't always want them) and it was close to impossible to identify such cases robustly (think of preceding lines with different depths) recent luatex has ways to disable that so i could finally come up with cleaner spacing models for display math so, apart from bugs the current model is the one that will stay (or course more control can be added) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------