![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/7325514c8a7b377b86d86ad29d35e8ef.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:47:32PM +0100, luigi scarso wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Ulrike Fischer
wrote: Am Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:54:04 +0100 schrieb luigi scarso:
It's not related to MKIV but to luatex.
I think it is related to MKIV (or more precisely to the fontloader). The message can be reproduced also with luatex --fmt=luatex-plain.fmt The font structure has a key checksum, but luatex doesn't use e by default is zero from vf from tfm used value type checksum yes yes no number default: 0 So maybe font_checksum is zero, and checksum is 32212676346 (i.e. the opposite that I wrote).
So now that is a question to Taco, if checksum is not used by luatex, why id there a difference when the font is loaded in the old way (i.e. no callbacks involved) and when it is loaded define_font callback? Regards, Khaled