On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 19:06 (+0100), Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 03.01.25 um 18:07 schrieb Jim:
I have made some edits to the wiki here and there when I got (more or less) definitive statements from someone who I assumed is a ConTeXt "guru" (or higher), or when I was correcting some typo or grammar error, or when I added an example I thought was enlightening. In this case, the edit is major, and I would not want anyone to feel I was stepping on anyone's toes by rewriting the examples in the framed page.
Has anyone who has read this far care to comment on the wiki questions: (1) Why does \over work correctly in the \framed wiki example, and (2) Should the example there be re-written to use preferred ConTeXt syntax?
As you can see on its start page,
Had I only known or thought to look! Thanks for the pointer.
the ConTeXt installation of the wiki is 2024.01.08, i.e. one year old. Since then, most of the math rewrite happened. (If Taco finds the time, it would make sense to update.)
There’s a lot of outdated code in the wiki, since it started in MkII times, and it’s not always obvious that something is outdated.
Quite true.
Besides, users have different styles of coding…
There is that. But style is one thing, and wondering why something in the wiki won't work at all is yet another.
But yes, please, if you see something outdated/oldfashioned/overly convoluted, change it if you know how! And if not, please ask to make those who know aware.
See my next message... Cheers. Jim