On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Peter Münster wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16 2010, Hans Hagen wrote:
as i never use vim for pretty printing i can not quickly test it so in order to be able to look into it i need a more precise test case
I'm sorry, I can reproduce this error only with the vim module.
Can others reproduce it, or am I the only one?
I can reproduce the error...but I have no idea what is causing it.
Here is a minimal example without the vim-typing module. \setupbodyfont[ss, 14pt] \setuppapersize[S6][S6] \def\startC% {\bgroup \whitespace \obeylines \ignoreeofs \ignorespaces \activatespacehandler{yes} \def\obeyedline{\par\strut}% \strut} \def\stopC{\egroup} \starttext \startC \stopC \xypos{XXX} \startC bla; bla; bla; \stopC \startC bla; bla; bla; \stopC \startC bla; bla; bla; bla; \stopC \startC bla; bla; bla; bla; bla; \stopC \stoptext which gives ! Missing number, treated as zero. <to be read again> \dontleavehmode <argument> \dontleavehmode \normalspace \secondoftwoarguments #1#2->#2 l.1 \the\dimexpr 63.6383pt-0pt\relax \MPy #1->\ctxlua {jobpositions.MPy("#1")} \dopresetpositionanchors ...expr \MPy \textanchor +\MPh \textanchor -\!!dime... ... l.36 bla; Aditya