Re: [NTG-context] r2l alignment and linenumbering conflict?

Hi Hans, Idris, Talal, Some years ago we had a discussion on the issue, but I don’t remember where we ended up… In my opinion, I think that the numberings should be maned as follows: arabicnumerals: should be ١,٢,٣,٤,٥,٦,٧,٨,٩,٠ persiannumerals: should be ۱ ۲ ۳ ۴ ۵ ۶ ۷ ۸ ۹ ۰ abjadnumerals: should be الف، ب، ج، د، ه، و، ز،….. As of today it seems that « persiannumerals » results in what should be named abjadnuemrals, and this is not correct. Best regards: OK

On 03 Aug 2015, at 16:56, Hans Hagen wrote:

what would be the proper name for such a conversion? simplearabic? arabicdigits?

...

[myconversion] [١,٢,٣,٤,٥,٦,٧,٨,٩,١٠, ١١,١٢,١٣,١٤,١٥,١٦,١٧,١٨,١٩,٢٠, ۲۱,۲۲,۲۳,۲٤,۲٥,۲٦,۲۷,۲۸,۲۹,۳۰, another million entries

Hans

----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________