2 Mar
2011
2 Mar
'11
10:56 a.m.
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:41:58AM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
2011/3/2 Mojca Miklavec
: I really like the particular answer pointing to bugroff licence: http://www.reocities.com/SoHo/Cafe/5947/bugroff.html
It's a nice joke, but for practical purposes a one-clause BSD license allows the same freedoms, but is legally clear.
I was about to say that, though I'm pro strong copyleft (AKA GPL when fits) myself, though I highly doubt, for practical reasons ;), that any one can take a BSD licensed ConTeXt and make a closed source derivative with any substantial improvement. Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Egyptian Arab