Re: [NTG-context] Bibliography issue, @ELECTRONIC editor

On 2017-02-24 19:31, Alan Braslau wrote:

On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:36:28 -0500 Rik Kabel wrote:

...

Although either editor or author should be accepted, only author is processed. There is a warning message generated by the publications subsystem: unable to create short for 'Edited', needs one of [author,editor] but clearly there is an editor. A reasonable workaround is to use author instead of editor, but it would be nice to have a fix. Editor is not a standard field for the entry @electronic. It is defined for @article, @periodical, @book, @inbook, @incollection, and @proceedings. This follows the bibtex documentation and the standard tools used for maintaining bib files.

Of course, we could add this, or any other field, but I find no entry either in the APA Specifications describing this.

Alan

Sorry. You are, of course, right about that. I misread the table in mkiv-publications. The problem I have is that all non-author electronic entries are grouped at the top of the bibliography by date. However, APA for electronic entries with no author should use the title (or a few salient words from the text) at the beginning of the bibliography entry. Currently ConTeXt uses a blank space and the date. -- Rik