![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e5aa6984b53b8925e405ebbdbc051ad9.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Am 28.08.24 um 16:47 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 at 12:03, Shiv Shankar Dayal wrote:
I have two specific interests. I want to make asymptote work with ConTeXt but I can live with including generated images and use PDFs.
There’s the built-in asymptote module: https://source.contextgarden.net/tex/context/modules/mkiv/m-asymptote.mkiv I don’t know if it still works and if it could/should be improved. There’s also Aditya’s filter module that alleviates calling external programs (I’m using it with LilyPond): https://github.com/adityam/filter But calling external programs is slow. MetaPost is fast, (also) because it is integrated as a library. It’s possible to address C libraries using Lua’s FFI (don’t ask me how, there is/was a manual). Also, Hans announced to include some "2.5D" functions (perspective projections) into MetaFun soon. That might obsolete some uses of Asymptote. But a proper 3D model for MetaPost seems to be missing (not my expertise).
The second interest is in Aditya Mahajan's syntax highlighting module. It is very nice but it invokes VI making the entire thing slow. I understand the advantage of using VI is that we do not have to implement anything when a new language comes. VI will have syntax highlighting and it will be automatically done for us.
ConTeXt does support native syntax highlighting. You can try to create some new grammars to extend language coverage (Hans only made sure that TeX, lua, metapost etc. work correctly). Or you can try to start brainstorming whether some existing OpenSource grammars could be integrated to do syntax highlighting using Lua.
Vi was a shortcut to get the syntax highlighting done in some way at all.
There’s also the scite module that uses SciTE’s lexers for syntax highlighting. The builtin highlighters are limited to TeX/ConTeXt, MetaPost, Lua and XML. Hraban