Re: [NTG-context] Bibliography: I think module [aps] is rendering incorrectly the electronic category and others too

On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:16:04 -0300 Tomas Badan wrote:

Looking at context documentations and source code, it says that for electronic category we have: * Required fields: title * Optional fields: address, author, howpublished, month, note, organization, url, year, doi

So, when I run this simple code:

\startbuffer[example] @ELECTRONIC {example, title = "One title", url = "http://www.example.org", } \stopbuffer

\usebtxdefinitions[aps]

\definebtxdataset[basic] \usebtxdataset[basic][example.buffer] \definebtxrendering [basic] [aps] [dataset=basic]

\setupbtx[dataset=basic] \nocite[example]

\starttext \placelistofpublications[basic] \stoptext

I've got an output that is similar with:

[1] , One title, http://www.example.org (unpublished)

which seems incorrect to me (author should not be rendered, and I was expecting year not to be accounted for too). Am I doing something wrong?

Thanks in advance Tomás

PS. Original question was posted here: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/480416/bibliography-what-is-the-corr...

The APS style definitions currently expect: "author", "collaboration", "organization" and, indeed, if there is none, it should not include the comma. So the texdefinition (in publ-imp-aps.mkvi) should be changed to: \starttexdefinition unexpanded btx:aps:author \btxdoif {author} { \btxflush{author} \btxcomma } \stoptexdefinition Secondly, why do you expect not to have (unpublished)? The APS style guides suggest that unpublished material should be labeled "unpublished" or "private communication". Alan