Hello

I completely removed all iterations of texlive from the spare computer I'm using for ConTexT (which is quite old - 2013), and reinstalled texlive this morning.  I'm still getting the same long list of font files being checked, but the run is down to 20 seconds if I log on as administrator, and that's just about tolerable for now while I'm experimenting.  I may set up on a more modern machine in the fullness of time!

Best wishes

John 🇪🇺  Слава Україні! 🇺🇦


Virus-free.www.avg.com

On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 at 16:19, Henning Hraban Ramm <texml@fiee.net> wrote:
Am 20.06.25 um 17:22 schrieb Hans Hagen:
> On 6/20/2025 4:06 PM, John Was wrote:
>> Dear Wolfgang
>>
>> Both of these process very quickly - 2 seconds for each separately,
>> and less than that if I put the Baskerville definition plus simple
>> text after the default Comp. Modern text.
>
> on a bit recent machine (say 5 years old) a simple few page run with
> lation modern should run way below a second and unless you do complex
> stuff performance should be some 30-40 pages per second .. if not, there
> is an issue with your installation

E.g. if TEXINPUT is set to a big tree, TeX will look through that for
every file. (I had TEXINPUT.lualatex set for a LaTeX project and it
increased processing time with that engine by minutes.)

Hraban
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive  : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki     : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________