Thank you Hans. The remaining problem is that the bigger shape is scaled down to the size of the smaller shapes. Sytse Here is the source: \setupFLOWcharts[ [ nx=1, ny=1, dx=40pt, dy=25pt, breedte=260pt, hoogte=130pt ] \setupFLOWlines [hoek=rond, kaderkleur=blauw, pijl=ja] \startFLOWchart[Observations] % The bigger shape \startFLOWcell \name{Obs} \location{1,1} \shape{action} \text{{\bf observations}} \stopFLOWcell \stopFLOWchart \setupFLOWcharts [ nx=3, ny=2, dx=40pt, dy=25pt, breedte=110pt, hoogte=130pt ] \startFLOWchart[Parameters] % The smaller shapes \startFLOWcell \name{Obs1} \location{1,1} \shape{node} \connection[bt]{CanPar} \stopFLOWcell \startFLOWcell \name{Obs2} \location{2,1} \shape{node} \connection[bt]{Means} \stopFLOWcell \startFLOWcell \name {CanPar} \location{1,2} \shape{action} \text{{\bf canonical\\parameters}\\$\btheta=\pmatrix{\theta_1\cr\vdots\cr\theta_n\cr}$} \connection[-r-l]{Means} \comment[t]{$\mu_i=h^{-1}(\theta_i)$} \comment[b]{$=b'(\theta_i)$} \stopFLOWcell \startFLOWcell \name {Means} \location{2,2} \shape{action} \text{{\bf means}\\~\\$\E\Y=\bmu=\pmatrix{\mu_1\cr\vdots\cr\mu_n\cr}$} \connection[+l+r]{CanPar} \comment[b]{$\theta_i=h(\mu_i)$} \connection[+r+l]{LinStruct} \comment[t]{link function} \comment[b]{$\eta_i=g(\mu_i)$} \stopFLOWcell \startFLOWcell \name {LinStruct} \location{3,2} \shape{action} \text{{\bf linear structure}\\~\\$\pmatrix{\eta_i\cr\vdots\cr\eta_n\cr}={\boldmath{\eta}}=\X\bbeta$} \connection[-l-r]{Means} \comment[t]{$\mu_i=g^{-1}(\eta_i)$} \comment[b]{response f.} \stopFLOWcell \stopFLOWchart \startoverlay {\FLOWchart[Parameters]} {\FLOWchart[Observations]} \stopoverlay At 4/22/2004 11:02, you wrote:
\startoverlay {... de chart ...} {... de chart ...} \stopoverlay