Hans Hagen
On 1-2-2012 19:31, Marco Pessotto wrote:
Hello there.
See the following minimal example. Without the \setupinteraction the document compiles just fine.
as there is no beta this week, you can patch yourself ... scrn-wid.lua ... should either have
b_scrn_comment_link
or
scrn_comment_box_link
(depending on what's n your system; you can search in scrn-wid.mkiv for the right box name)
Well, I've applied this change and executed context --make --- ./tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/scrn-wid.lua~ 2011-05-24 11:32:54.000000000 +0200 +++ ./tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/scrn-wid.lua 2012-02-03 09:44:14.000000000 +0100 @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ end function commands.insertcomment(specification) - tex.box["scrn_comment_box_link"] = comments.insert(specification) + tex.box["b_scrn_comment_link"] = comments.insert(specification) end -- Soundclips This is better, as the compilation doesn't fail and the comment appears as comment, but on the page there is a literal "[title=,]" (in the first example) or "[title=commentname,]" in the second and third example. \setupinteraction[state=start] \starttext Regular 1 \startcomment 1. This won't be published, but attached as a comment \stopcomment Regular 2 \startcomment[commentname] 2. This won't be published, but attached as a comment \stopcomment Regular 3 \startcomment[commentname][] 3. This won't be published, but attached as a comment \stopcomment \stoptext There is no problem in the "current" version (2011.05.18), but is present in version 2011.11.29 23:11 (which is the other previous version I have on my machine). Thanks for your attention and all your work. Best regards. -- Marco