Hi, I tried to write one some time ago but it seems my knowledge of ConTeXt was insufficient. I gave up. I also think it would be nice. If I can recall, one of the first problems I ran into concerned how ConTeXt environments work (among other things I cannot recall). In LaTeX, you have something like: \begin{theorem} When you are writing the grammar, you can clearly separate the tokens into '\', 'begin', '{' and '}'. So you get a consistent object that the tree-sitter library can work with. But with ConTeXt, you have something like this: \startTheorem We know that it is actually made up of '\', 'start' and 'Theorem'. But there is nothing separating the latter two so I couldn't find a way to make it general enough across board because of how configurable ConTeXt is (we have very few pre-defined environments). So I went with \start[theorem]. I am very sure it was my skill but just some thoughts from someone who tried in the past. Maybe we could benefit from pre-converting the source file to an XML-like tree before applying the grammar? At which point you are venturing into LSP territory... Jethro On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 7:36 PM juh+ntg-context--- via ntg-context < ntg-context@ntg.nl> wrote:
Dear all,
no mention here https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/ and searching for treesitter on the Wiki gives no match?
Many texteditors have treesitter support builtin so having a ConTeXt grammar would be nice.
TIA juh
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________