![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/532990f0c5a8331f60e3d0e1173292a6.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ntg-context
mailto:ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl> Im Auftrag von Hans Hagen
via ntg-context
Gesendet: Montag, 29. August 2022 13:58
An: ntg-context@ntg.nlmailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl
Cc: Hans Hagen
mailto:j.hagen@xs4all.nl>
Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] Parallel texts: verse with blanks between stanzas
via tabulate
On 8/29/2022 1:31 PM, Denis Maier via ntg-context wrote:
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Hans Hagen
mailto:j.hagen@freedom.nl>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. August 2022 10:41
An: mailing list for ConTeXt users
mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Cc: Maier, Denis Christian (UB)
mailto:denis.maier@unibe.ch>
Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] Parallel texts: verse with blanks between
stanzas via tabulate
On 8/27/2022 11:25 PM, Denis Maier via ntg-context wrote:
Thanks, Wolfgang. That gives me a blank between the verses. However
the
blank is rather huge and I don't see how I could make it smaller? Is
it possible to do this?
morning exercise attached (you can run the file)
Hans
Another, more general question on this: why is the function
poetry.sidebyside defined twice? If I understand correctly, depending on the
input one or the other will be used, but I don't see where that happens...
the first can be commented as it is the first simple variant
I see. Thanks for the updated version. So, that means the basic restriction is that blanks will need to be inserted between rows, right? We cannot have to two completely independent formatted poems, right? (For reference, see the attached PNG. This was done with paragraphs, and works as longs as this stays on a single page. One is one long stanza, the other one consists of multiple smaller stanzas.) Denis