On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:57:32PM +0100, Jonas Stein wrote:
In that case one should better run mtxrun instead of luatools (they are equivalent at the moment, but luatools is becomming obsolete).
Ahhh ... I guess that needs some divine inspiration to know ...
And yes, texmfcnf.lua should be carefully designed to match the structure of texmf trees in debian.
Of course, looking into it I graasped that now.
Why on earth can mtxrun not simply load the main texmf.cnf like any other program in the TeX world and initialize the values from there I ask myself.
I am slowly giving up on ConTeXt. It is changing in arbitrary directions far too often, and still things like multi-user support are not here since ages. I know, it is primary Hans' system and it has to work primarily on his computer, but that means that distributing it within any distribution system is plain pain :-(
All that of course relates only to MkIV. I guess I will just add one sentence to the README.Debian: MkIV is not suppored on Debian. If you know how to set it up you can do it yourself and educate the maintainer, otherwise simply use MkII or the ConTeXt minimals.
Its so sad to read this but no other reply on this thread till now. As far i have looked into the .deb packages the bug should be in the current stable versions too.
The ideas behind context are so nice and could save us from so much latex-pain. If there are no context-packages, that work out of the box it will be a project for developers. Developers are known to code and not to write documentation...
Use MkII it is tried, documented and stable. It is unfair to complain about something as " changing in arbitrary directions" when it is declared "beta" and "ever evolving" with big red letters every where :)
Is there any hope that context will become a replacement of latex?
I don't think this have been a goal. Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer