On 7/31/06, Hans Hagen wrote:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Helin Gai wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up ConTeXt to use the Lucida Bright Font. I've already installed the font in the "LaTeX way" and it works pretty well in LaTeX. But when I use the following:
On 7/31/06, Helin Gai wrote:
I wrote a typescriptfile according to the manual of TeXfont (attached below) and with the following code
OK, now I understand it. After some time of playing (before this thread was started) I came out with some definitions like these: % at least the basic ones which are needed for a document to compile properly \definefontsynonym [lbmr] [hlcrm] [encoding=default] \definefontsynonym [lbmo] [hlcrima] [encoding=default] \definefontsynonym [lbms] [hlcry] [encoding=default] \definefontsynonym [lbme] [hlcrv] [encoding=default] \definefontsynonym [lbma] [hlcra] [encoding=default] \definefontsynonym [texnansi-lbr] [hlhr8y] [encoding=texnansi] \definefontsynonym [texnansi-lbd] [hlhb8y] [encoding=texnansi] \definefontsynonym [texnansi-lbsl] [hlhro8y] [encoding=texnansi] \definefontsynonym [texnansi-lbi] [hlhri8y] [encoding=texnansi] \definefontsynonym [texnansi-lbdi] [hlhbi8y] [encoding=texnansi] \definefontsynonym [texnansi-lbrsc] [hlhrc8y] [encoding=texnansi] \loadmapfile[lucida.map] \usetypescript[lucida][texnansi] \setupbodyfont[lucida] But then again I didn't understand how it was possible that so many people were using lucida without any problems. (And that it was only me who had problems installing the font - I simply took all the files from the "LaTeX world" and forgot about using texfont, which caused me some headaches until now anyway.)
\usetypescript[lucida][\defaultencoding]
Hmmm ... Yesterday I figured out that lucida doesn't support EC (ie. doens't have enough glyphs to cover Slovenian and Croatian). I guess that only texnansi is a sensible choice. :( (I hoped that empty slots in Hans's manuals were a consequence of faulty ec.enc files, but now I figured out that the font has indeed many glhyps missing.) Mojca