24 Mar
2010
24 Mar
'10
6:25 p.m.
On Wed, Mar 24 2010, Hans van der Meer wrote:
Must I really understand from your reply that \setupinmargin[x=y] is not equivalent to \setupinmargin[][x=y]? That is: an absent optional argument is not really optionally absent?
Your [] is not an absent optional argument at all, it is a given optional argument (that is empty).
Point taken. But should that has the effect: "ignore what follows in the second argument?"
You can consider this logic: \setupinmargin[left][...] % apply ... to left \setupinmargin[right][...] % apply ... to right \setupinmargin[][...] % apply ... to nothing Cheers, Peter -- Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/