Re: [NTG-context] bug in mkii xetex: mp figure is not in the right position

Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:09:08AM +0100, luigi scarso napisał(a):

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Marcin Borkowski < mbork@atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl> wrote:

...

Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:38:59AM +0100, luigi scarso napisał(a):

...

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM, wrote:

...

ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.

yes, true.

Not entirely (see below).

please, note: not **all** context peaple (whatever peaple means!) have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX, but **some** context peaple (I, for example, assuming peaple == people ) You are a counter example . So the statement is ** entirely true **.

ok, I give up;)

...

...

Also LaTeX peaple always have used to say that LaTeX is better than ConTeXt is true

yes, as before

...

...

...

I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems that

ConTeXt

...

...

has heaps of bugs.

There are some bugs.

As in most software projects. And, that;s true, there _are_ lots of bugs in ConTeXt. But still, it is very usable.

"lots of bug" and "still very usable" are contradictory statemens .

No. Most popular case: M$ Windows (although personally I'll argue about their "usability";)). The point is that ConTeXt bugs do not crash it in usual scenarios, but rather when some complex interactions are involved. So usually everything is fine, _unless_ you want something strange. And then - well, _strange_ things do happen.

...

...

...

LaTeX rocks...!

true, if you are from LaTeX peaple.

see before .

...

...

-- Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl)

Emacs: Escape-Meta-Alt-Control-Shift.

true . ** entirely true **.

Glad you like it. (Personally, I use both emacs and vim. Really.) BTW: do you know what "vim" means? It is an old African word meaning "how do you quit this f#####g s##t?" Greets -- Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl) People can be divided into three groups: those who can count and those who can't.