![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/49e63acb01f2ca80efce7eed08310ce8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 22-8-2011 09:15, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi
Consider the following example:
\startluacode print("lualetterbackslash:", [=[\\include]=]) \stopluacode
\def\lualetterbackslash{\letterbackslash} \startluacode print("letterbackslash:", [=[\\include]=]) \stopluacode
\bye
gives
lualetterbackslash: \\include letterbackslash: \include
I find the second alternative better. Why is \lualetterbackslash defined differently from \letterbackslash?
to avoid problems with \n, \t and such btw, best use context.include then as it provides you better tracing Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------