![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/fbdc3a5450adf8003a5d6075aefb5ebd.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hello, the version number of luatex has been incremented on http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/luatex, but the underlying tarball has exactly the same md5sum as the tarball of release 0.25.2. Is this correct? BTW they unpack itself into a directory luatex-beta-0.20.2 (and so did release 0.25.1, too). Sincerely Stefan Husmann
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/1aaa8171e46f2c29d4441fa99a7fc634.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Fr, 18 Apr 2008, stefan-husmann@t-online.de wrote:
http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/luatex, but the underlying tarball has exactly the same md5sum as the tarball of release 0.25.2.
I cannot confirm that, I have
d23378e0465c34c3d50e1193e56e2b38 luatex-beta-0.25.2.tar.bz2
02ac022d53f3a89350233f7679e84e21 luatex-beta-0.25.3.tar.bz2
which is different.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/565476157eb3895a9c928ffce26d988d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
stefan-husmann@t-online.de wrote:
Hello,
the version number of luatex has been incremented on http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/luatex, but the underlying tarball has exactly the same md5sum as the tarball of release 0.25.2.
Is this correct?
BTW they unpack itself into a directory luatex-beta-0.20.2 (and so did release 0.25.1, too).
The files are definately different. Perhaps your proxy is overeager in caching them? Best wishes, Taco
participants (3)
-
Norbert Preining
-
stefan-husmann@t-online.de
-
Taco Hoekwater