After updating to revision 2426 i get the following while trying build --make. Same on full rebuild. Do you get the same? ... checking for native WIN32 or MINGW32... mingw32 checking for main in -lwsock32... yes checking for Mac OS X Carbon framework... no checking for pkg-config... no checking for installed fontconfig headers and library... no configure: WARNING: Sorry, can not build XeTeX without Carbon framework or fontconfig checking for X... no configure: error: Sorry, could not find required X include and library files. make[2]: *** [config.status] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/work/luatex/trunk/build/texk/web2c' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/work/luatex/trunk/build/texk' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 ... -- Pawe/l Jackowski P.Jackowski@gust.org.pl
Hi Paweł, Paweł Jackowski wrote:
After updating to [luatex repository] revision 2426 i get the following while trying build --make. Same on full rebuild. Do you get the same?
Not really the same because I actually have X11 headers, but yes, it seems that a recent change in the configure scripts of texlive means that X11 is now required unless yet another --without-something option is added to the configure command line. Can you please edit luatex's build.sh and add the line --without-mf-x-toolkit --without-x \ to the list of configure options? I hope that helps. Hi Peter also, when you get back, can you please change this? It a bit odd that an explicit --disable-mf is not good enough to make the implicit toolkit check disappear Best wishes, Taco PS I know the --without-x should not be needed, but I am getting quite paranoid by now.
... checking for native WIN32 or MINGW32... mingw32 checking for main in -lwsock32... yes checking for Mac OS X Carbon framework... no checking for pkg-config... no checking for installed fontconfig headers and library... no configure: WARNING: Sorry, can not build XeTeX without Carbon framework or fontconfig checking for X... no configure: error: Sorry, could not find required X include and library files.
Hi,
Can you please edit luatex's build.sh and add the line
--without-mf-x-toolkit --without-x \
Works fine.
PS I know the --without-x should not be needed, but I am getting quite paranoid by now.
I've checked that --without-mf-x-toolkit is enough. Thank you! -- Pawe/l Jackowski P.Jackowski@gust.org.pl
I've checked that --without-mf-x-toolkit is enough.
Oooops, just in case it matters, it was enough to build from existing makes, but once I rebuild all without --without-x \ option then I get the same X-error. -- Pawe/l Jackowski P.Jackowski@gust.org.pl
On Do, 04 Jun 2009, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Can you please edit luatex's build.sh and add the line
--without-mf-x-toolkit --without-x \
For Debian I patched in
--without-x
and that turned out to be enough so that no checking on X headers is
done.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Do, 04 Jun 2009, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Can you please edit luatex's build.sh and add the line
--without-mf-x-toolkit --without-x \
For Debian I patched in --without-x and that turned out to be enough so that no checking on X headers is done.
Hi Taco and Norbert, I have just updated the option handling in TL svn (r13767) as follows: with '--disable-mf' and with neither '--with/without-mf-x-toolkit' nor '--with/without-x', without is assumed in both cases. Regards Peter
On Mo, 15 Jun 2009, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
I have just updated the option handling in TL svn (r13767) as follows:
with '--disable-mf' and with neither '--with/without-mf-x-toolkit' nor '--with/without-x', without is assumed in both cases.
As usual, big thanks!
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining
participants (4)
-
Norbert Preining -
Paweł Jackowski -
Peter Breitenlohner -
Taco Hoekwater