19 Feb
2011
19 Feb
'11
2:25 p.m.
Le 19/02/2011 14:05, Heiko Oberdiek a écrit :
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 01:41:30PM +0100, Paul Isambert wrote:
No, the conversion is done by TeX, \directlua sees the \par then. Then
\directlua{
foo = 1}
should be read as "\parfoo=1", and it isn't. Or is there something I'm missing? Yes, you example and some testing shows, that it isn't tex.print, but \directlua seems to remove \par if it has its original meaning.
So I guess it's definitely a feature (quite useful), not a bug. But that should be mentioned in the manual. Best, Paul