Jonathan Fine wrote:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
[discussion of plans snipped]
PDF is very strong in the print field. However, the web page is also an important medium, and as I said in my response to Mojca, I'd like to be
pdf is also quite strong in the preview on the web field; it packages all the resources in the file which is quite different from dvi
able to view and interact with typeset material on a more-or-less ordinary web page.
well, go ahead then and extend your favourite tex variant then; as far as i understood you already did something like that; also keep in mind that luatex, becoming a flexible machine, most likely becomes slower than faster; maybe next year (when we're further with redoing the backend) we might discuss dvi again;
I'd also like to have TeX or an extension available as a typesetting engine for an interactive graphical typesetting program.
For these reasons, and also so that LuaTeX and XeTeX could share more code and ideas, I'd like both systems to use a common extension of DVI.
well, it makes no sense to put a burdon on both developments; xetex is the fast tex variant that uses libraries and has dvi as intermediate format, while luatex is the flexible (at the cost of speed and to some extend system integration) with a focus currently on pdf; each has its use etc etc; if we (luatex team) at some point decide to drop dvi (as taco mentioned) then we take that freedom (and might provide an api for others to cook up a superdvi backend) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------