[changed to dev-context] Hans Hagen said this at Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:07:44 +0100:

lucida is a special case -)

because i used lucida a lot, those definitions ended up in the core, but when i bought more and more fonts, i finally decided to move the lucida defs to the type-buy.tex typescript because that;s where they belong

you can add the line:

\usetypescriptfile[type-buy]

to the cont-sys.tex file, but best is (because it's a document property) to say in you document (or style):

\usetypescriptfile[type-buy] % loads commercial font definitions \usetypescript[lucida][texnansi] % defines a lucida typeface \setupbodyfont[lucida,12pt] % enables the typeface defined as 'lucida'

That reminds me, Hans. The PCTeX edition of Lucida are floating around. I've done some preliminary typescripts, and they seem to fit in well. I need to track down some issues with obscure math characters (making them match CM math), figuring out if the discrepancy is in the current math- lbr definitions, or in changes with the new fonts. Other than that, what should the definitions be called? \starttypescript[lucidanew]? doing an override in type-dis? Cheers, adam -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk Lancaster University, InfoLab21 +44(0)1524/510.514 Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-