feature requests from contextgarden
Hello, it would probably make sense to delete this page: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Feature_Requests I moved some items here: https://foundry.supelec.fr/tracker/index.php?group_id=21&atid=164 For the remaining ones I have no idea whether they can be considered as feature requests or not. (OOo's XML format might be a good idea, but too much work, \textmu might be resolved with OpenType/Unicode with no extra work, \Fixme only makes sense if someone is willing to try it out & going to use it) But I don't know which other feature requests that I copied make sense either ... I haven't found any option to change priority (perhaps I just don't have enough rights). Mojca
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
it would probably make sense to delete this page: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Feature_Requests
I moved some items here: https://foundry.supelec.fr/tracker/index.php?group_id=21&atid=164
For the remaining ones I have no idea whether they can be considered as feature requests or not. (OOo's XML format might be a good idea, but too much work, \textmu might be resolved with OpenType/Unicode with no extra work, \Fixme only makes sense if someone is willing to try it out & going to use it)
\textmu is already files as a bug report \Fixme will be the topic of the `how to write a module' tutorial at Epen OOs XML is interesting but needs either a volunteer (not Hans, nor me) or outside funding . So my opinion is that the page can go, but I'll wait a day or so before actually doing it. Taco
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
\Fixme will be the topic of the `how to write a module' tutorial at Epen
Great! I have been planning to write a module that does something like that, but I have never managed to completely figure out the type of output that I want (endnote, footnote, sidenote,) and the features to support: list of fixme's, how critical is the fixme (show in log, give a warning, give a error), etc. Aditya
participants (3)
-
Aditya Mahajan -
Mojca Miklavec -
Taco Hoekwater