[resent without attachment] Hans Hagen said this at Tue, 26 Apr 2005 02:11:04 +0200:

...

3) The concept sounds sort of like EC encoding (in its relationship with TS1), but with less of the backwards-compatibility "cruft". Should I take that as a starting point, or work with texnansi?

qx

Okay, take a look at http://homepage.mac.com/atl/tex/nieuwxtwo.pdf. Is that the sort of coverage you're interested in? Do you need Turkish? (I blew dotlessi away earlier on, and forgot to put it back in) The layout (ordering of the characters) needs some work. The strategy for keeping punctuation was those that fall in normal text, and are likely to be governed by a kern/ligature, should stay. Let me know if you object to any that are still in. Characters that fell in (only) Latin, Esperanto, Sami, Greenlandic, or Latin Extended-B didn't make the cut. Thoughts? -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk Lancaster University, InfoLab21 +44(0)1524/510.514 Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-