Hello Hans, According to AGLFN at http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/opentype/aglfn13.txt consider for example the glyph 0420;afii10034;CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER ER in char-def.lua you have [0x0420]={ ["adobename"]="afii0x2732", ["category"]="lu", ["cjkwd"]="a", ["contextname"]="cyrillicR", ["description"]="CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER ER", ["lccode"]=0x0440, ["linebreak"]="al", ["unicodeslot"]=0x0420, -- Р }, So: ["adobename"]="afii0x2732", "instead of" afii10034. What do you suggest? I guess that adobename might need to have multiple entries anyway. Mojca
So: ["adobename"]="afii0x2732", "instead of" afii10034.
What do you suggest? I guess that adobename might need to have multiple entries anyway.
Obviously, the decimal number 10034 has been abusively transformed into its hexadecimal equivalent, I guess by table.serialize or something similar. It seems to be the case for all the other glyphs with an AFII name, and I consider this a mistake. I think it should be reverted back. Arthur
Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
So: ["adobename"]="afii0x2732", "instead of" afii10034.
What do you suggest? I guess that adobename might need to have multiple entries anyway.
Obviously, the decimal number 10034 has been abusively transformed into its hexadecimal equivalent, I guess by table.serialize or something similar. It seems to be the case for all the other glyphs with an AFII name, and I consider this a mistake. I think it should be reverted back.
hm, i wonder if/when i touched them Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
ok, new beta ... ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Looks nicer now :-) By the way, was there a bug in table.serialize or some other “public” function? Something to worry about? Arthur
Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
Looks nicer now :-)
By the way, was there a bug in table.serialize or some other “public” function? Something to worry about?
no, it probably went wrong when i merged some extra data in the file (and in the process hex'd the numbers); nothing to wory about (btw, by now table.serialize is pretty stable) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
no, it probably went wrong when i merged some extra data in the file (and in the process hex'd the numbers); nothing to wory about
OK, good to know then.
(btw, by now table.serialize is pretty stable)
Oh, I didn't mean to despise it; I love it and I use it all the time! Arthur
participants (3)
-
Arthur Reutenauer -
Hans Hagen -
Mojca Miklavec