Adam Lindsay wrote:
Taco Hoekwater said this at Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:32:00 +0200:
I've considered using TeX 'n' ANSI as the "companion" font anyway, so that is very plausible as a workaround.
In that case, I propose a completely new companion encoding with a name like "asciibats", that has all of the visible ascii glyphs in their normal spots, and the other text-like symbols in the upper range.
Cool. That'll be next. Any non-obvious suggestions off the top of your head?
For glyphs to be included you mean? At least everything in /AdobeStandard, MacRoman Encoding and the Windows 1252 codepage that's not in /AdamsDenseEncoding already. Besides that, I'm not sure. LaTeX's TS1 has lots of expert glyphs, but the whole concept of expert fonts is rapidly becoming obsolete... The rest