Re: [dev-context] problems with xtable and export xhtml

24 Feb 2012


      On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
 wrote:
...
Am 24.02.2012 um 13:06 schrieb luigi scarso:
...
It seems that xtable doesn't export @rows and @columns
This patch to tabl-xtb.mkvi works, not sure if it is a good style.
\unexpanded\def\tabl_x_start_cell_construct_yes[#settings]%
 {\dostarttagged\t!tablecell\empty % can't we just tag the box
  \setbox\b_tabl_x\hbox\bgroup
  \setupcurrentxtable[#settings]
  \letxtableparameter\c!width \d_tabl_x_width  % overloads given width
  \letxtableparameter\c!height\d_tabl_x_height % overloads given height
  \ctxcommand{x_table_init_construct()}%
  \inheritedxtableframed\bgroup
  \tabl_x_begin_of_cell
  \def\tablecellcolumns{%
     \ifnum\csname \m_mult_interfaces_namespace nx\endcsname>\csname
\m_mult_interfaces_namespace nc\endcsname%
       \csname \m_mult_interfaces_namespace nx\endcsname%
     \else
       \csname \m_mult_interfaces_namespace nc\endcsname%
     \fi}%
  \def\tablecellrows{%
    \ifnum\csname \m_mult_interfaces_namespace ny\endcsname>\csname
\m_mult_interfaces_namespace nr\endcsname%
      \csname \m_mult_interfaces_namespace ny\endcsname%
    \else
      \csname \m_mult_interfaces_namespace nr\endcsname%
    \fi}
  \dotagxtablecell}
You need this
\appendtoks
  %\def\dotagxtablecell  {\taggedctxcommand{settagtablecell(\number\tablecellrows,\number\tablecellcolumns,\number\raggedstatus)}}%
   \def\dotagxtablecell  {\taggedctxcommand{settagtablecell(\number\c_tabl_x_nx,\number\c_tabl_x_ny,\number\raggedstatus)}}%
   \def\dotagxtablesignal{\char\zerocount}% not used
\to \everyenableelements
and this change
%\unexpanded\def\tabl_x_start_cell_construct_yes[#settings]%
%  {\dostarttagged\t!tablecell\empty % can't we just tag the box
%   \setbox\b_tabl_x\hbox\bgroup
%   \setupcurrentxtable[#settings]%
%   \letxtableparameter\c!width \d_tabl_x_width  % overloads given width
%   \letxtableparameter\c!height\d_tabl_x_height % overloads given height
%   \ctxcommand{x_table_init_construct()}%
%   \inheritedxtableframed\bgroup
%   \tabl_x_begin_of_cell
%   \dotagxtablecell}
\unexpanded\def\tabl_x_start_cell_construct_yes[#settings]%
 {\dostarttagged\t!tablecell\empty % can't we just tag the box
  \setbox\b_tabl_x\hbox\bgroup
  %
  \letxtableparameter\c!nx\plusone
  \letxtableparameter\c!ny\plusone
  \letxtableparameter\c!nc\plusone
  \letxtableparameter\c!nr\plusone
  %
  \setupcurrentxtable[#settings]%
  %
  \c_tabl_x_nx\directxtableparameter\c!nc\relax
  \c_tabl_x_ny\directxtableparameter\c!nr\relax
  \ifnum\c_tabl_x_nx=\plusone
    \c_tabl_x_nx\directxtableparameter\c!nx\relax
  \fi
  \ifnum\c_tabl_x_ny=\plusone
    \c_tabl_x_ny\directxtableparameter\c!ny\relax
  \fi
  %
  \letxtableparameter\c!width \d_tabl_x_width  % overloads given width
  \letxtableparameter\c!height\d_tabl_x_height % overloads given height
  \ctxcommand{x_table_init_construct()}%
  \inheritedxtableframed\bgroup
  \tabl_x_begin_of_cell
  \dotagxtablecell}
Wolfgang
yes, I suppose something similar -- I'm checking


-- 
luigi