![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/49e63acb01f2ca80efce7eed08310ce8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
That reminds me ...
Hans Hagen
wrote: * mutations to cont-new.tex
I believe you should strive for cont-new.tex to be completely empty whenever a current alpha/beta becomes the new release. Personally I find cont-new.tex more of a problem than an asset (most of the time). It is very easy to end up with 'out of sync' versions that are inputted runtime and (re-)introduce weird bugs.
when i find the time i'll do it; the problem is that i then forget about the yet undocumented new things in there -) imagine that you also have a cont-loc on your system ...
Another thing: it would be nice if we could add an --uninstall or --upgrade or --install option to texexec. Sometimes old files need to be deleted, and this is not easy for 'normal' users. If you like the idea, I could have a go at it (I'd make a standalone version first, just like texversion.pl)
makes sense so go ahead Hans