Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 16:18 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Norbert Preining wrote:
forwarded 447559 dev-context@ntg.nl thanks
Hi Hans, hi all!
We got the following bug report for the Debian package, but I guess that should be fixed upstream: for latex, ppchtex is loaded via ppchtex.noc which says ...
\let\normalunexpanded\unexpanded
\input supp-mis.tex \let\writestatus\undefined \input syst-gen.tex \input syst-fnt.tex
\let\unexpanded\normalunexpanded
(\unexpanded is an etex primitive but context had an \unexpanded before etex came around; same for \protected as primitive; so here we push and pop the meanings)
so, i wonder if this user loads ppchtex in the right way
(maybe i should make a derived version for latex usage - given that there are users - in which case i can also cleanup and optimize the context variant, but it has low priotity)
OK I got like two reports from different users who exactly had the same problem.
One fixed it by simply inputting everythin in the .tex file:
\input supp-mis.tex \input syst-gen.tex \input syst-fnt.tex \input m-pictex.tex \input m-ch-en.tex
the other removed the lines
\let\normalunexpanded\unexpanded \let\unexpanded\normalunexpanded
from ppchtex.nox .
Then it worked for both.
So whatever you do please fix it as it is a bug that does not only annoy me or alternatively tell us please how to correctly use m-ch-en ...
well, does the \let\normalunexpanded\unexpanded \input supp-mis.tex \let\writestatus\undefined \input syst-gen.tex \input syst-fnt.tex \let\unexpanded\normalunexpanded method work? i cannot test it since i only run context Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------