Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 16 Apr 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
indeed we need the latest although in the luatex version there is a kind of fallback name subsystem,
Aehmmmmm.... what does this mean??? So either you need it, or there is a fallback system ... semantics are sometimes dangerous ;-)
well, it may work with the old fonts (depends on how old), in font-syn.tex you will find fonts.names.new_to_old = { ["lmroman10-capsregular"] = "lmromancaps10-oblique", ["lmroman10-capsoblique"] = "lmromancaps10-regular", ["lmroman10-demi"] = "lmromandemi10-oblique", ["lmroman10-demioblique"] = "lmromandemi10-regular", ["lmroman8-oblique"] = "lmromanslant8-regular", ["lmroman9-oblique"] = "lmromanslant9-regular", ["lmroman10-oblique"] = "lmromanslant10-regular", ["lmroman12-oblique"] = "lmromanslant12-regular", etc. so older fonts are ok for context/luatex; while for xetex new fonts are needed.
So if we ship the old or the new one there is no problem with the one or the other?
not for luatex/context Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------